Lil’ Sass: Adventures of Emotions
What a privacy-first storytelling app actually looks like
If a product invites a child to describe how they feel, the privacy question is not a compliance exercise. It is the product question.
There is a category of children’s app that has arrived faster than the norms governing it: generative storytelling. The pitch is genuinely appealing — a personalised book starring your child, produced in minutes. The part that receives less attention is what had to be collected, transmitted and retained to produce it.
Lil’ Sass: Adventures of Emotions sits in that category and was designed with the question in front, not behind. What follows is how we think about it, written plainly enough to be useful to anyone evaluating a product like this — ours or somebody else’s.
What does the app actually do?
A reader chooses how they look — skin tone, hair, cape colour, a favourite object. A character from the Lil’ Sass cast then asks six questions about a feeling they are having and where it sits in their body. From those answers the app generates a twelve-page illustrated book in which the reader is the hero, ending in ‘the move’: a physical action for processing the feeling.
It is designed for readers aged 5 to 18 and the adults alongside them, and it is built on The Adventures of Lil’ Sass book series — same cast, same Venice Beach roller rink world.
What is the actual risk with children’s AI apps?
Three distinct ones, which are often collapsed into one and should not be.
Identification. A generative model receiving a child’s real name alongside a disclosure about how they feel creates a linkage that did not previously exist, in a system you do not control.
Disclosure handling. A product that invites children to describe difficult feelings will eventually receive something that needs a human being, not a story. A system with no path for that is not neutral; it is actively unhelpful at the worst possible moment.
Consent theatre. A checkbox asserting that a parent approves is not parental consent. It is a record that somebody clicked.
How does Lil’ Sass handle each of these?
Names never reach the AI. Personal identifiers are stripped before anything is sent to a generation model. The finished story is personal; the data handed to the model is not. The child sees their name on the page without their name having travelled to produce it.
Conversations are screened. Inputs pass through screening designed to catch disclosures that warrant a human response rather than a generated narrative. A storytelling app is not a clinical tool and should not pretend to be one; what it can do is recognise when it is out of its depth.
Parental consent is verified for under-13s. Readers under 13 require verified parental consent before an account can be used — a gate, not a notice.
The full detail sits in our privacy policy, and support is available through our support page.
Why does the app teach a physical technique?
Because naming a feeling and metabolising one are different operations, and most emotional literacy material stops at the first.
Every generated book ends in ‘the move’ — a bodily action the reader can perform. This matters for a reason that is easy to miss: a child in a large feeling has reduced access to language and reasoning, and full access to their body. A technique that requires them to think clearly is a technique that fails exactly when it is needed.
It is the same principle behind the emotional leadership work we do with executives, described in our piece on coaching cultures: know what dysregulation feels like in the body before it reshapes behaviour.
How should a parent or school evaluate an app like this?
Four questions worth asking of any product in this category, including ours.
- What specific data is transmitted to a third-party model, and is any of it identifying?
- What happens when a child discloses something serious — is there a defined path?
- How is parental consent actually verified, as opposed to asserted?
- Who owns the generated content, and how long is it retained?
If a product cannot answer those in plain language on a public page, that is itself an answer.
Who operates the app?
Lil’ Sass: Adventures of Emotions is operated by Dunbar Group & Associates LLC, a consulting and creative holding company that owns and stewards the Lil’ Sass intellectual property alongside its leadership transformation practice.
Institutional licensing is available for schools, healthcare settings and community programmes alongside individual subscriptions. Enquiries are handled here.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lil’ Sass: Adventures of Emotions safe for children?
It is built with privacy as a design constraint: names never reach the AI systems that generate the story, conversations are screened, and verified parental consent is required for readers under 13.
What age range is the app for?
Readers aged 5 to 18, and the adults alongside them. Adults use it directly as well.
Does the app replace therapy or clinical support?
No. It is an emotional literacy and storytelling product, not a clinical tool. Screening exists precisely so that disclosures needing a human are not met with a generated story.
Can schools license the app?
Yes. Institutional licensing is available alongside individual subscriptions through Dunbar Group & Associates.
Keep reading
Field notes
Leadership worth thinking about, once a month
Essays on conscious leadership, emotional wellness and the craft of building cultures that hold up under pressure. No pitch, no filler. Unsubscribe in one click.
Next step
Want to talk about applying this in your organization?
Start with a 30-minute conversation. We will listen first and tell you plainly what we think.